On reflecting on this last film project, I have concluded that the process did not come without some major difficulties; both creative and personal. The initial ideas process was probably the most productive part of the whole process. Once the initial confusion of the project was dealt with, we began to come up with some good ideas, influenced by some very inspirational material. We went through quite a productive ideas process. It turned out that we had some pretty similar ideas, we all wanted to create a piece that raised awareness and showed love and respect to our common people. My first influence was from a project run by Subaru car company, about donating a certain amount of their profits in order to benefit all different kinds of charities and individuals. Another member of my group provided his influences from a viral video, highlighting the dangers that come from smoking, and how important it is to take care of our health for the benefit of themselves and those around them; the base idea was to concentrate on helping and respecting others.
Our final idea came down to focusing on the misfortune of those who have found themselves to be homeless; we wanted to gather peoples opinions on why these people have run into such troubles, and what we can do as individuals, as well as in society as a whole.
Practically, the process of producing our piece came with quite a few hurdles to overcome. In our first filming session, we encountered problems mainly surrounding the weather. It was incredibly windy, raining, and the lighting was all over the place due to the time of day. Because of this, we found it difficult to get people to actually stop and talk to us. This first session wasn’t very well planned, and the questions we asked were just off the top of our heads. We needed to go back and plan our filming sessions more thoroughly, so they were more structured and productive.
After going back and planning more thoroughly, we decided that Chelsea and Aidan would go back out and film, and Kayleigh and I were to edit it all together. The second filming session was somewhat more successful; we had planned out our questions, and the filming was done at a more appropriate time of day. Unfortunately, some of our sound footage was lost and we had no choice but to either cut out the whole interview with that particular person, or use the sound which was captured on the onboard mic. In our presentation, it was pointed out that this was the wrong decision; we did not realise how much the surrounding noise effected what was being said. Added to this was some music which we thought would be appropriate, which actually turned out to be unproductive and unnecessary; for this reason, it was cut out of our film. There was also the fact that we had a lot of text in our film, and the pace of it made it rather difficult for people to take in what we were trying to say. Because of the tight deadline, we decided to just lay this over the images, as we didn’t want to cut it out completely; but it wasn’t visually acceptable to us.
Another problem encountered was more to do with personal differences; a certain member of our group took on the role of the leader, but did not provide a lot of leeway for other people’s input. I think lack of communication was our downfall and what ultimately led to us not being pleased with our final edit.
Overall, I think our final project could have been a lot stronger, but certain factors, including planning, editing and personal problems led to our work not being of the standard that we all would have liked.